Customer Rating: 




Summary: Provides you a lot of control over printing - at a cost
Comment: I bought this printer to replace my Canon PRO9000. My primary motivation was the ink system - I wanted a pigment based ink system, I wanted multiple black inks for better B&W, I wanted to produce archival quality prints and the ability to print on a wider range of specialty papers than supported for the PRO9000. Finally, I wanted to keep my purchase cost around $700. This leaves the r2400, Canon PRO9500 and the HP B9180. It appeared to me there is a wider range of icc profiles for papers I am interested in for the Epson that isn t a rigourous, scientific census - just my opinon . I have owned HPs and Canons. I was open to trying Epsons to see if I like them as much as many others do.
My only rap on the delivery of the printer is that the box was pretty chewed up when it arrived via UPS though the machine was OK.
Set up was straightforward on my Mac OSX machine. My impression of doing so it s been a few weeks now was that I actually resorted to reading the manual at a couple of points - not something I typically need to do for a printer.
Overall I d say this printer is like driving a car with manual transmission where the rest of the field are automatics. This isn't a printer system you will configure once and click-print unless you intend to use one ink-set/paper combination for everything.
Following the analogy to a car, if your printing needs are mixed media, general printing with a 13x19 print a few times a year I don't think this is a good choice. You will be happier with nice "automatic".
On the other hand if you are familiar with the issues of color management as it applies to printing, you know what an icc profile is and have dozens of them, understand what the difference is between reflective vs. perceptual intent and calibrate your monitor every couple of weeks this printer offers you a lot of control over almost every aspect of your output. But you have to manage much of it.
Is the r2400 "better than" anybody else? There are other sites to delve into details of the quality issues (like Luminous Landscape). I put some of the prints I m getting from the r2400 next to prints of the same file from prior machines and the differences are generally subtle for color prints. The improvement in B&W is significant. As far as resolution and such goes at the desktop level you are far more likely to effect those aspects through your file handling and configuration settings than with the mechanical aspects of the printer.
There are downsides to this machine. The ink is very expensive and the r2400 chews it up pretty fast. I haven't done enough printing to put very hard numbers to that yet but it feels like I m paying about $0.45 per print in ink on an 8x10. I was warned about this by some experts prior to buying. In fact I was really encouraged to spend the extra dough and go for the 3800 for the larger ink tanks. For me it came down to allocation of resources. I need the money for other things and don't need to produce large volumes of prints. I am not, however, busting out as many large prints as I was on the PRO9000 because of the cost issue.
It is slow when you are producing highest quality prints. I don't think this would be a good solution for anyone needing a production printer.
To conclude I am not in love with this printer but it does what I ask of it and does it well. I have a lot of control over the output along with the responsibility to know what I have to do to achieve it. It's pricey to operate and delivers high quality prints.
Customer Rating:




Summary: A great printer
Comment: The printer printed right out of the box . It prints great in black and white and also color . It is very simple to use if you pay atention . I reminds me of my very old original Epson color printer . The menues are easy to follow . I mismatched some paper and still got great prints . The Ink capacity is small but comparable to most othe printers when printing 8 by 10's . larger prints of course use more . I plan on mostly printing 11 by 17's and the other sizes on occasion .
Customer Rating:




Summary: LOVE IT!
Comment: I take several Photography classes at my local College and this is the printer we use. It produces great images and is pretty easy to use. The cost was always prohibitive until now, I bought this item yesterday for a song and there is also a hundred dollar rebate at the Epson website through 3/30/08 for this item.
Customer Rating:




Summary: Fabulous Printer
Comment: I have used a number of printers over the years and had pretty good luck with most of them whether Epson Canon or HP. But when I got got the R2400 I was blown away. The richness and detail I was able to get from my prints was staggering. I've been using the matt black and matt papers with a great deal of success. The fact that you have to swap out ink cartridges to use glossy papers is a drag plus you end up losing ink in the change over. I use a 1280 for glossies. It's not the printer this is but its a workable compromise for the time being. I found it worked perfectly running OSX Tiger as long as I used a direct cable (rather than through a hub). It works fine with Leopard except the printer utility to check ink level etc doesn't work in Leopard. So tracking ink levels is more guess work than science. Hoping for an update from epson or apple. That aside the results from printing from photoshop, lightroom or iPhoto have been gallery worthy.
Customer Rating:




Summary: Epson R2400
Comment: Good black and white uses lots of ink not much better than epson R 1200





Summary: Provides you a lot of control over printing - at a cost
Comment: I bought this printer to replace my Canon PRO9000. My primary motivation was the ink system - I wanted a pigment based ink system, I wanted multiple black inks for better B&W, I wanted to produce archival quality prints and the ability to print on a wider range of specialty papers than supported for the PRO9000. Finally, I wanted to keep my purchase cost around $700. This leaves the r2400, Canon PRO9500 and the HP B9180. It appeared to me there is a wider range of icc profiles for papers I am interested in for the Epson that isn t a rigourous, scientific census - just my opinon . I have owned HPs and Canons. I was open to trying Epsons to see if I like them as much as many others do.
My only rap on the delivery of the printer is that the box was pretty chewed up when it arrived via UPS though the machine was OK.
Set up was straightforward on my Mac OSX machine. My impression of doing so it s been a few weeks now was that I actually resorted to reading the manual at a couple of points - not something I typically need to do for a printer.
Overall I d say this printer is like driving a car with manual transmission where the rest of the field are automatics. This isn't a printer system you will configure once and click-print unless you intend to use one ink-set/paper combination for everything.
Following the analogy to a car, if your printing needs are mixed media, general printing with a 13x19 print a few times a year I don't think this is a good choice. You will be happier with nice "automatic".
On the other hand if you are familiar with the issues of color management as it applies to printing, you know what an icc profile is and have dozens of them, understand what the difference is between reflective vs. perceptual intent and calibrate your monitor every couple of weeks this printer offers you a lot of control over almost every aspect of your output. But you have to manage much of it.
Is the r2400 "better than" anybody else? There are other sites to delve into details of the quality issues (like Luminous Landscape). I put some of the prints I m getting from the r2400 next to prints of the same file from prior machines and the differences are generally subtle for color prints. The improvement in B&W is significant. As far as resolution and such goes at the desktop level you are far more likely to effect those aspects through your file handling and configuration settings than with the mechanical aspects of the printer.
There are downsides to this machine. The ink is very expensive and the r2400 chews it up pretty fast. I haven't done enough printing to put very hard numbers to that yet but it feels like I m paying about $0.45 per print in ink on an 8x10. I was warned about this by some experts prior to buying. In fact I was really encouraged to spend the extra dough and go for the 3800 for the larger ink tanks. For me it came down to allocation of resources. I need the money for other things and don't need to produce large volumes of prints. I am not, however, busting out as many large prints as I was on the PRO9000 because of the cost issue.
It is slow when you are producing highest quality prints. I don't think this would be a good solution for anyone needing a production printer.
To conclude I am not in love with this printer but it does what I ask of it and does it well. I have a lot of control over the output along with the responsibility to know what I have to do to achieve it. It's pricey to operate and delivers high quality prints.
Customer Rating:





Summary: A great printer
Comment: The printer printed right out of the box . It prints great in black and white and also color . It is very simple to use if you pay atention . I reminds me of my very old original Epson color printer . The menues are easy to follow . I mismatched some paper and still got great prints . The Ink capacity is small but comparable to most othe printers when printing 8 by 10's . larger prints of course use more . I plan on mostly printing 11 by 17's and the other sizes on occasion .
Customer Rating:





Summary: LOVE IT!
Comment: I take several Photography classes at my local College and this is the printer we use. It produces great images and is pretty easy to use. The cost was always prohibitive until now, I bought this item yesterday for a song and there is also a hundred dollar rebate at the Epson website through 3/30/08 for this item.
Customer Rating:





Summary: Fabulous Printer
Comment: I have used a number of printers over the years and had pretty good luck with most of them whether Epson Canon or HP. But when I got got the R2400 I was blown away. The richness and detail I was able to get from my prints was staggering. I've been using the matt black and matt papers with a great deal of success. The fact that you have to swap out ink cartridges to use glossy papers is a drag plus you end up losing ink in the change over. I use a 1280 for glossies. It's not the printer this is but its a workable compromise for the time being. I found it worked perfectly running OSX Tiger as long as I used a direct cable (rather than through a hub). It works fine with Leopard except the printer utility to check ink level etc doesn't work in Leopard. So tracking ink levels is more guess work than science. Hoping for an update from epson or apple. That aside the results from printing from photoshop, lightroom or iPhoto have been gallery worthy.
Customer Rating:





Summary: Epson R2400
Comment: Good black and white uses lots of ink not much better than epson R 1200

